Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Taking the decision of prosecution out of commanders hands.

I have decided that I am on the side of taking the decision of going toward a court-martial, is cases of sexual assault, out of the hands of the commander. I have read the bill and listened to hours of testimony and this is another way the branches can show that they have no tolerance for sexual assault.

Of the testimonies against this action were commanders in the different branches. They stated that taking this action would take away the ability of the commander to set the tone for no tolerance. It also would take away the deterrent the commander has of going to court martial if the member does not accept an Article 15 (non-judicial punishment). I don’t see it that way. If there is not sufficient evidence for a court-martial then giving the member the option of Article 15 or court-martial is still there.

Say Marine A is in front of the commander and has been accused of sexual assault. If the lawyer does not see the ability of going straight to a court-martial the commander can still give the Article 15, or lesser reprimand, which with the non-judicial punishment proceedings Marine A could demand a court-martial instead. The ability to back the no tolerance is still there. What is no longer there is the ability of the commander to discreetly do away with the allegations or to give a lesser reprimand to Marine A because Marine A happens to be what they call a golden soldier.

I, unfortunately, saw way too many allegations go nowhere because it is easier to silence a victim than to deal with what is happening in the squadron. Most disturbing was many of the accused were commanders. I understand this was over 20 years ago, but I have not been out of touch with what is still occurring. I have heard hundreds of people’s stories (if not more) and there was ample evidence for prosecution, but the commander decided not to do anything, or give a slap on the wrist, even just a “don’t do that again.”


My reply to the commanders is – this is not some new epidemic, it has been going on longer than 20 years, and so far the commanders (as a whole) have not done a good job, so why would we believe them now? If true action is to be taken, then let’s take it. This actually does not interfere with the commander’s authority, but backs it. If there is ample reason for court-martial then that should already have been the commander’s decision. It is the commanders that want to not prosecute that this “interferes” with. Commanders are not lawyers, they are not (generally) educated in the legal aspects of prosecution, especially for such a heinous crime as sexual assault.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Understanding MST and what should be done, before we act we must think.

To many the news of Military Sexual Trauma is a recent development, recent epidemic, unfortunately it is not. While I was in the military, over 20 years ago, sexual assault was a problem back then too. There are hundreds of thousands of survivors of MST, both men and women.

I have been asked if the military itself is a culture for sexual assault. I do not believe so. I have met thousands of service members and veterans who served (are serving) honorably. There are problems within the military, but before anyone comes up with changing the whole system, we need to think. The military is not any other type of organization and that needs to be understood first off. Some concepts, rules and regulations that would not be considered at all in the civilian work world must continue in the military. I have not yet completely made up my mind on the suggestion that reports of sexual assault be taken out of military jurisdiction and placed under civilian authority. As being a survivor, I do understand the want to not allow commanders the ability to dismiss reports or to slap wrists for sexual assault; but I also understand the reason behind the commander having such powers of immediate punishment.

            I listened to the hours of the House Armed Services Committee hearings and can see there is a lot of lip service from the branches, but I also see that many well-intended people do not fully grasp the mission of the military with many of their suggestions.

            Before looking into the culture of the military, we should look at what has happened to our American culture. First off let me make this very clear – women and men are not the same and never will be. We can be treated equally but that is not what many so called feminist are perpetuating. Many feminist are advocating far beyond what used to be the definition of feminist. They are trying to neutralize the physical and spiritual differences between men and women. It does not matter how high you try and yell that women and men are the same, we are not, and we are not supposed to be. It is a fact that there are differences, physically, chemically and spiritually between men and women.

            Our culture has had a serious attack on the family and morality, yet it seems many do not see the connection between that and the downward spiral that this country is in. One of the first things all the branches can do is to raise the standards of entry in the service. When any of the branches does not get near its quota they lower the standards and allow substandard applicants in, this creates a substandard soldier. No person who has been convicted of sexual assault should ever be allowed into the military, as well as certain other offenses. The military is not a place for people to fix their own issues, or escape from whatever is going on in their life. The military needs to make sure the people going in are physically and mentally well. The military does not need to be seen as a “last resort” for anyone. It needs to be looked upon as a choice on the same level as a good job, and even schooling.

            The moral attack on our culture can easily be seen by looking at the television with such shows coming on as Pregnant and Dating and new terms like “baby daddy.” I know the very mention of morality and people begin to start saying that I am just a hater. Let me explain something very carefully so that is in no way taken out of context. My moral values and beliefs do not mean that I hate anyone. I can say fully that I know many homosexuals and I care for them, but their behavior is immoral, period. I have acquaintances who I stand next to on many issues, who are in relationships (man and woman) and are not married but living together, that also is immoral. I am tired of hearing that my beliefs are somehow equal to hatred of others, they are not. I can discuss many issues with facts and stats and beliefs without calling anyone else a derogatory name. This country (whether some want to remember or not) was founded on Christian values. Oh, and if anyone wants to actually discuss the issue of church and state (without name calling and make sure you know history) I have no problems. Many people do not actually look into what they have heard, they do not question what is told to them, they just accept it. I am a firm believer that the world is getting warmer; I am not at all on the side that we are the reason for it. I have seen real research, not fluffed up articles, and it is not a cause and effect. The earth actually has gone through many warm and cooling spells, long before we were here, why would that change now? I find it astonishing that many have never read one single true research paper and call others names who do not agree with the human caused green-house global warming concept. As a researcher, that is what I like to do, look at the data, not what another has interpreted the data to mean.

            Another way that the branches can stop giving just lip service that they are doing everything they can to decrease sexual assaults is to discharge (not honorably or even General under honorable conditions) anyone who has been convicted of sexual assault. For convictions I am referring to any type – if they agree to an Article 15 instead of court martial, or the commander has given a lesser punishment, they should automatically be put in for a discharge.

            And the last, yet will be the most denied as well as fought to keep – stop the mandatory and accepted drinking parties. It is not that drinking causes assaults, but we all know what alcohol does to the brain. That was pretty much the thing to do in the military, drink, especially in my career field – cops seemed to drink excessively. The military needs to understand that the still accepted way of dealing with trauma and stress, drinking, needs to change. It is a weaker person who reaches for the bottle than to ask for help. The stigma and myths of mental illness needs to be taught though out the branches. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder should not be considered a disorder. It is a normally reaction to an abnormal event.



            Again, I still have not decided that the correct route is to take the authority away from commanders. There are programs that are in place at this time, they are just in trial mode, but they seem to have potential. Unfortunately along with well-meaning people there are those who are jumping on the wagon with other agendas. I will not stand idly by and allow this; I shall call them out when I come across them. MST has nothing to do with how many women are in the military, or where they are posted. MST has nothing to do with homosexuality. MST is about power, control, humiliation, and anger; let us all remember that.https://www.createspace.com/pub/simplesitesearch.search.do?sitesearch_query=understanding+mst&sitesearch_type=STORE